REVIEW FORM for CS 558: Data Mining Workshop (Borrowed from ICML'99) ================================================================ AUTHORS: TITLE: ---------------------------------------------------------------- SUBJECT: IN ONE SENTENCE, STATE WHAT THE PAPER IS REALLY ABOUT. ---------------------------------------------------------------- SIGNIFICANCE: HOW IMPORTANT IS THE WORK REPORTED? HOW DIFFICULT IS THE PROBLEM IT ATTACKS? WHAT LESSON(S) DOES THE PAPER OFFER THE SCIENTIFIC COMMUNITY? ---------------------------------------------------------------- ORIGINALITY: TO WHAT EXTENT IS THE REPORTED WORK NEW? TO WHAT EXTENT ARE THE TECHNIQUES, METHODS, OR FINDINGS NEW? TO WHAT EXTENT DOES THE PAPER DISCUSS RELEVANT RESEARCH? ---------------------------------------------------------------- CORRECTNESS: IS THE PAPER TECHNICALLY SOUND? ---------------------------------------------------------------- EVALUATION: DO THE AUTHORS CAREFULLY EVALUATE THEIR APPROACH THROUGH SYSTEMATIC EXPERIMENTS, THEORETICAL ANALYSIS, OR SOME CHALLENGING, APPLICATION-SPECIFIC DEMONSTRATION? DOES THE EVALUATION RESULT IN COMPELLING EVIDENCE FOR PERFORMANCE GAINS OVER ALTERNATIVE APPROACHES, PSYCHOLOGICAL VALIDITY, AND/OR PRACTICAL UTILITY? ---------------------------------------------------------------- CLARITY: DOES THE PAPER DESCRIBE THE METHOD(S) IN SUFFICIENT DETAIL FOR A READER TO REPLICATE THE WORK? DOES IT DESCRIBE THE INPUTS, OUTPUTS, AND THE PROCEDURE(S) EMPLOYED? COMMENT ON THE CLARITY OF THE PAPER'S ORGANIZATION AND EXPOSITION. ------------------------------------------------------------------ OTHER COMMENTS: ANYTHING ELSE? < Other comments> ------------------------------------------------------------------ REVIEWER'S CONFIDENCE : < High Medium Low > ------------------------------------------------------------------ REVIEWER'S NAME : ------------------------------------------------------------------