ENG 401 Presentation of Technical Material

Review Form

REVIEWER'S NAME: ........................................................................

TITLE:

........................................................................................................................................................

AUTHOR'S NAME:...........................................................................

SUBJECT: In one sentence, state what the paper is really about.

........................................................................................................................................................

SIGNIFICANCE: How important is the work reported? How difficult is the problem it attacks? What lesson(s) does the paper offer the scientific community?

........................................................................................................................................................

ORGANIZATION: Is the paper well-organized? Is the use of style consistent? Does the paper contain spelling errors or typos? Are the tables and figures properly numbered and captioned?

........................................................................................................................................................

QUALITY: Is the paper technically sound?

........................................................................................................................................................

CLARITY: Does the paper describe the method(s) in sufficient detail for a reader to replicate the work? Does it describe the inputs, outputs, and the procedure(s) employed? Comment on the clarity of the paper's organization and exposition.

........................................................................................................................................................

LANGUAGE: Is the language understandable? Does the paper contain grammatical errors?

........................................................................................................................................................

REFERENCES: Are references to previous work adequate?

........................................................................................................................................................

RECOMMENDATIONS: Comment on possible recommendations that could improve the paper.

........................................................................................................................................................